1 APHC010034202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 290/2026 Between: 1. SRI P SUDARSHAN REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. P.SANKARA REDDY, D.NO.6-46-1, R/O. GOVINDAPALLE VILLAGE, SIRIVELLA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRIET. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION AND CAD, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI VARA PRASAD, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, SRINIVASA NAGAR, SAROJINI DEVI LAYOUT, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH -517507. 4. SRI KABIR BASHA SHAIK, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (PROJECTS) WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL 5. C PRATHAP, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, NANDYAL, 2 KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. SRI MURALI KRISHNA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, T.G.P DIVISION, ALLAGADDA, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 18-08-2025 in WP.No.17271 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri. T. Ashok Srivastava Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case 2. Recording the same, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 Gss