Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15348 WP No. 7377 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 7377 OF 2023 (MV)
BETWEEN:
H R RAJU S/O H M RAMANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, BUS OPERATOR, PROP: MUTHYALAMMA TRANSPORT, NO.15, HENNUR VILLAGE, DANADAMABA TEMPLE ROAD, KALYANAPURA POST, BANGALORE - 560 043. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A S PARASARA KUMAR.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15348 WP No. 7377 of 2023
AND:
1.
THE CHAIRMAN, REGIONAL TRANSPORTAUTHORITY, BANGALORE CENTRAL, BANGALORE RURAL, HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 102.
2.
SRI K VIKRAM S/O LATE J P KUMAR, MAJOR, PROP: RAJKUMAR MOTOR SERVICE, NO.127, BASAVANAGUDI ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPUR - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI RAO.,HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. M E NAGESH.,ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN RP.NO.122/2022 DATED 28.02.2023 IN REJECTING THE REVISION PETITION ON IA NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15348 WP No. 7377 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw this writ petition, which reads as under:
" The petitioner submits that the above writ petition I filed against the impugned order passed by the tribunal in dismissing the revision petition on I.A.No.1 for condonation of delay. However, during the pendency of the above writ petition the renewal of permit made in favour of 2nd respondent vide Annexure-E expired on 17.06.2023. It is submitted in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court decided in the case of M/s. Jeeva Transport Corporation Limited Vs. KSTAT & others vide W.A.No.73/1992 dated 14.11.1995 last but one para of the judgment has held that once the period of renewal is served out, the writ petition filed before this Hon'ble Court has become infructuous due to passage of time and no orders could be passed by this Hon'ble Court. Hence, the petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the above writ
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15348 WP No. 7377 of 2023
petition as the same became in fructuous as on today, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. The said memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50