Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10219 (ALL)

RAJESH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/8926/2025 · 2026-09-27

Vivek Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8926 of 2025 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.153 of 2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station Alinagar, District Chandauli, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant or the informant to press this anticipatory bail application, even in the revised call, though the learned A.G.A. for the State is present. 3. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. Either the applicant has been arrested or apprehension of his arrest no longer survives. 4. Present anticipatory bail application is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Office to communicate this order to the court concerned within a week. 7. If the cause of action still survives, the applicant may file appropriate application for reviving the matter on merits. September 28, 2026 Radhika Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Indrajeet Kumar Shukla, Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, G.A. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Rajesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad