STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. PRABODA NAND MEGHWAL SON OF SHRI JAMANA LAL
SAW/806/2025 · 2026-07-13
Inderjeet Singh, Sandeep Taneja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10217 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10217 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26301-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 806/2025 URN: SAW / 1709U / 2025
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Superintendent Of Police, Kota, District Kota Rural (Raj.).
4. District Collector Bundi (Land Revenue), District Bundi (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus Praboda Nand Meghwal Son Of Shri Jamana Lal, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Rayta, Post Ramganjbalaji, Thana Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Samee Khan for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order 13/07/2026
1. Defect(s) pointed out by the office, if any, is waived.
2. Heard on application (CMCW No.737/2025) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
4.
Learned counsel for the appellants submit that the controversy involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by
[2026:RJ-JP:26301-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-806/2025] the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.61/2024 (State of Rajasthan Vs. Vinod Kumar Meena & Anr.) and other connected matters decided on 05.04.2024. Operative part of the judgment is quoted hereunder:-
“4. In the present case, the respondents, vide impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, have been granted only salary part and there is no order protecting them from recovery against expenses incurred on training. That being the legal and factual position, the issue raised in this batch of appeals is squarely covered by order dated 13.12.2016 passed in the case of Jagdish (supra). 5.Accordingly, the State appeals are liable to be dismissed and are accordingly dismissed.”
5. In view of the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Vinod Kumar Meena (supra), the present appeal stands dismissed. All the pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J 136/AVINASH GULERIA