RAKESH KUMAR GARG v. UMESH KUMAR MITTAL AND 2 OTHERS
A227/6865/2017 · 2026-09-29
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10216 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10216 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6865 of 2017 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Learned counsel for petitioner has placed before the Court certified copy of the order passed in Original Suit No.06 of 2013 filed by the plaintiffs-respondents, which has been withdrawn by order dated
12.09.2026.
2. As the suit itself has been withdrawn, writ petition has become infructuous and the same stands dismissed as infructuous. September 30, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Govil, Ravi Bala Counsel for Respondent(s) : Hari Nath Tripathi (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Rakesh Kumar Garg .....Petitioner(s) Umesh Kumar Mittal And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad