CRM-M-7019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 143+333 GURINDER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Saurav Bhatia, for the petitioners. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. for respondent No.2 and 3. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-7015-2026 This is an application under Section 528 of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 of Arms Act which were added later on, in the head note and prayer cl the present petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, is hereby added in the present petition. Disposed of. 7019-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: SINGH @ LADDI GATKE WALA AND Versus PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Kuljinder Singh Billing, Advocate for respondent No.2 and 3. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 2026 This is an application under Section 528 of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for adding offence under Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act which were added later on, in the head note and prayer cl the present petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, is hereby added in the present petition. Disposed of. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-7019-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.02.2026 @ LADDI GATKE WALA AND OTHERS ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Kuljinder Singh Billing, Advocate This is an application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik for adding offence under Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act which were added later on, in the head note and prayer clause of For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, is hereby added in the present petition. ….Petitioners ....Respondents Bharatiya Nagarik for adding offence under Section 25 and 27 ause of For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed GURPREET 2026.02.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-7019 MAIN CASE 1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the B Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District Taran Tarn, Pun therefrom on the basis of 2. This Court vide order dated to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appe Additional Chief recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate effect that the co and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of th continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in 7019-2026 (O&M) 2 MAIN CASE This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the B Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.258, dated 05.11.2025, under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District Taran Tarn, Punjab (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 06.02 to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appe Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate, Tarn Taran has submitted report dated effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.258, dated 05.11.2025, under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District subsequent proceedings arising (Annexure P-2). 02.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Tarn Taran and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Additional Chief has submitted report dated 16.02.2026 to the mpromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. e above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and hartiya Nagrik FIR No.258, dated 05.11.2025, under Arms Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District subsequent proceedings arising had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness ared before the and got their statements Additional Chief to the mpromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 e above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and GURPREET 2026.02.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-7019 another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and Sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS and Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District Taran Tarn, Punjab (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of 7. Pending of, accordingly. 18.02.2026 Gurpreet 7019-2026 (O&M) 3 another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 , this petition is allowed and FIR No.258, dated 05.11.2025, under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS and Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District Taran Tarn, Punjab (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.258, dated 05.11.2025, under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District subsequent proceedings arising (Annexure P-2) are quashed. miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 FIR No.258, dated 05.11.2025, under Arms Act (added later on), registered at Police Station Sadar Taran Tarn, District subsequent proceedings arising miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.