[2026:RJ-JP:27179] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5596/2026 URN: CRLMB / 9980U / 2026 1. Sayad Salauddinn S/o Sayad Sarfuddin, Aged 38 Years, R/o Village Rudrar Police Station Kodganl District Vikarabad, Telangana At Present R/o As A Tenent House No. 8-3-162 / A / 10 / C Sanjay Nagar, Yusuf Guda, Police Station Borabanda Hyderabad, Telangana. (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). 2. Abdul Samad S/o Abdul Babu Miya, Aged 28 Years, R/o Village Kairili, Police Station Dharud District Vikarabad, Telangana (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners against the order dated 06.04.2026 passed by learned trial Court under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.77/2025 registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4) & 61(2)(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; charge-sheet has already been filed; that there are no [2026:RJ-JP:27179] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5596/2026] criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners but did not dispute the fact that are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners 4. Heard and perused the material available on record and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 29.03.2026; that charge-sheet has been filed; that no criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-petitioners; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Sayad Salauddinn S/o Sayad Sarfuddin and Abdul Samad S/o Abdul Babu Miya are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:27179] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5596/2026] 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present addresses along with mobile numbers to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile numbers and addresses. In case, the accused-petitioners change their addresses or mobile numbers, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioners are further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in thier possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drives along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, SHO and jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 120/EKTA