APHC010370212010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 46/2010 Between: 1. MOLLOLA SEKHAR BABU, S/O. KRISHNAIAH RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/O. ARKONAM VILLAGE, VELLORE DISTRICT, TAMILNADU STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MOLLOLA PREMA NIRMALA DEVI, W/O. SEKHAR BABU HOUSEWIFE R/O. CABINPET, NIDUBROLU VILLAGE OF PONNUR MANDAL, 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision Case by setting aside the Order dated 08-12-2009 in Crl.M.P. No. 6099 of 2007 in M.C. No. 6 of 1986 passed by the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 68 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 08-12-2009 in Crl.M.P. No.6099 of 2007 in M.C. No. 6 of 1986 passed by the Court of the -2- CRL.R.C. No.46 OF 2010 Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur, pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case. IA NO: 2 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 708 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim suspension Order dated 25.01.10 in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.68/2010 in Crl.R.C.No.46/2010. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. N SUBBA RAO -3- CRL.R.C. No.46 OF 2010 The Court made the following order: None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the 1st respondent submits that instant criminal revision case has been preferred against the order of enhancement of the maintenance amount. He further submits that this Court, at the time of admission of this revision, has directed the petitioner to pay 1/4th of the arrears of maintenance amount within a period of 60 days on 25.01.2010. The order of this Court has not been complied with. 3. Having heard the learned counsel, it appears that since the petitioner has not complied with this order, this Court think it necessary to heard the matter on merit basing on the material available on record. 4. It appears that vide order, dated 08.12.2009, learned Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur has passed an order under Section 127 (2) Cr.P.C whereby the previous maintenance in favour of 1st respondent was enhanced from Rs.1,200/- per month to Rs.2,500/- per month. 5. The said order is under challenge before this Court, it appears that the maintenance amount of Rs.2,500/- is very meager one. 6. I find no justification to interfere with the order, it is not at all inhibitant. Thus, the instant criminal revision case has no merit. -4- CRL.R.C. No.46 OF 2010 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. Petitioner is directed to comply with the order passed by the learned trial Court by paying the regular maintenance and the arrears of maintenance amount has to be paid by the petitioner to the 1st respondent within three months in three equal installments. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal revision case shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date : 18.09.2026 SPP -5- CRL.R.C. No.46 OF 2010 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 46 of 2010 Dated 18.09.2026 SPP