1 ( 2026:HHC:8835 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.62 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 ___________________________________________________ Sansar Chand ....Petitioner Versus M. Sudha Devi and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 17.03.2026, wherein it has been mentioned as under:- “As order passed by the Hon’ble High Court, as per opinion of Ld. A.G. and as per approval received from the Govt. vide their letter dated 24.12.2025, the due and admissible benefit is hereby allowed to the petitioner on the analogy of Babu Ram case subject to legal remedy, if any being exercised by the State. Hence, the case of the petitioner is considered and decided accordingly. All the concerned be intimated accordingly.” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:8835 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the matter is closed. Notice discharged. ( Sushil Kukreja ) March 25, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)