Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010289992025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/229/2026 SRI ANIL DAS SON OF SRI DULESWAR DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SANATAN GAON, P.O. AND P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DISTRICT- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 787001. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FISHERY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED CACHAL VIP ROAD GUWAHATI-36 3:THE DIRECTOR OF FISHERY ASSAM MEEN BHAWAN GUWAHATI-16 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER LAKHIMPUR NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-787001. 5:THE DISTRICT FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Page No.# 2/3 LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-787001. 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SUBANSIRI REVENUE CIRCLE GHILAMARA DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN- 787053 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N BORAH, MR. R SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AFDC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 21.01.2026 Heard Shri N. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, whose principal grievance was against an order dated 22.12.2025 issued by the Managing Director, AFDC. The grievance is also with regard to non-compliance of the order dated 26.06.2025 passed in WP(C)/3612/2025. The learned counsel has however submitted that after filing of the writ petition, an order has been passed on 03.01.2026 by the Managing Director, AFDC whereby the petitioner has been allowed to proceed in terms of the settlement order dated 23.08.2022 and the agreement dated 16.09.2022. Shri Borah, the learned counsel has submitted that in view of the aforesaid development, the substantial grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. However, the prayer with regard to the compliance of the order Page No.# 3/3 dated 26.06.2025 in WP(C) No./3612/2025 still remains. Also heard Shri R. Chetri, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri P. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, AFDC and Ms. U. Das, learned State Counsel. This Court is of the opinion that in view of the order dated 03.01.2026, a copy of which is placed on record, the substantial grievance of the petitioner appears to have been redressed. So far as the grievance relating to non compliance of the earlier orders passed by this Court, the petitioner would have the recourse to file appropriate application in accordance with law. In view of the above, writ petition stands closed. Copy of the order dated 03.01.2026 is made part of the records. JUDGE Comparing Assistant