JAGO ALIAS JAGMOHAN MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./827/2026 · 2026-02-26
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10209 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10209 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5740 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 827 of 2026
--------- Jago @ Jagmohan Munda, aged about 25 years, son of Doman Munda, resident of village Matuda, P.O. & P.S. Chowka, District Seraikella- Kharsawan.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Praful Jojo, A.P.P.
--------- 02/ 26.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 302, 201, 34 of IPC.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner. Further, the charges have been framed and as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused namely, Rohidas Munda @ Ruidas Munda and Mokma Munda have been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.04.2024, passed in B.A. No. 722 of 2024 and B.A. No. 769 of 2024 respectively. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations against the petitioner as well as the fact that co-accused have been granted bail; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only)
2026:JHHC:5740 2 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge, Crime Against Woman, Seraikella in connection with MCRA No. 1269 of 2025 arising out of Chowka P.S. Case No. 21/2023, corresponding to S.T. Case No. 214/2025.
6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 26th February, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 27.02.2026