Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10206 (AP)

MS INRA v. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS

CC/2311/2026 · 2026-09-10

V Sujatha

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010218242026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2311/2026 Between: 1. MS INRA, REP BY. DEVI REDDY SRIKANTH REDDY, S/O DEVIREDDY RAMI REDDY, AGED ABT 47 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR (CIVIL), R/O. 1-3-549-11, CHENNAREDDY COLONY, NEAR MAHALAKSHMI TEMPLE, PULIVENDULUA, KADAPA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRICIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATHI - 522237 2. SRI DR SREEDHAR CHEMKURI IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT. - 516 001 3. SRI A C REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, SKD GNSS PROJECT CIRCLE, NTR TGP COLONY,MAMILAPALLI(V), KADAPA - 516 318 4. SRI D VENKATESWARA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PBC DIVISION, PULIVENDULA, KADAPA DISTRICT-516 390 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to pleased to prosecute the Respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their willful and deliberate violation of the orders dated 24.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.27261 of 2025 and punish them and pass s Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARUPILLI SARADA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Ms. Sarada Marupilli, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case. 2. Recording the same, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 Gss