P.Vijaya kumar v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/6340/2026 · 2026-03-12
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10205 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10205 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 6340 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 6340 of 2026 P.Vijaya kumar S/o.Perumal 8/1111, Puliyanthoppu, Kattavaram, Kettavarampalayam, Thiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police Adamangalm Pudur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.35/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in respect of Crime No.35 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Adamangalam Pudur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District, pending investigation, and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): S.B.Viswanathan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 6340 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 69 of BNS Act, in Crime No.35 of 2026 registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner fall in love with the defacto complainant and on the false promise to marry her, had sexual intercourse with her, due to which she become pregnant. Hence a case has been registered against the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the forensic report regarding DNA is yet to be received. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 6340 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side.
6. Considering the nature of the allegation and the fact that the investigation is still pending, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 12-03-2026 MPA To 1.The Inspector of Police Adamangalm Pudur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.35/2026 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 6340 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MPA CRL OP No. 6340 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis