Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10202 (UTT)

ABDUL RAB v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2886/2024 · 2026-08-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010167052024 2026:UHC:7114 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2886/2024 Abdul Rab --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Deepak Chandra, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order passed by Divisional Officer, Tarai West Forest Division, Ramnagar under Section 61- A(1) of Indian Forest Act, 1927 as applicable in State of Uttarakhand. 4. Since petitioner has remedy of appeal under Section 61-A(4) of Indian Forest Act, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for challenging the impugned order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.08.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE 5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.12 10:47:19 +05'30'