GANGA SAHAI MEENA S/O SHRI MOOL CHAND MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7002/2025 · 2026-03-17
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1020 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1020 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11263] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7002/2025 Ganga Sahai Meena S/o Shri Mool Chand Meena, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Village Ramgarh, Near Prajapati Dharamkanta, Mahwa, Mandawar Road, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The District Collector, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Mahwa District Dausa, Rajasthan.
4. Shri Harkesh Meena, Then Tehsildar, Mahuwa, District Dausa Presently Sdo Reni, District Alwar.
5. Sarita Meena, Then Junior Accountant, Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa Now Junior Accountant In The Office Of Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Mahuwa, District Dausa.
6. Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Revenue Accountant, Sansthapan, Tra, Tehsil Mahuwa District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajanand Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/03/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition assailing order dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Tehsildar Mahuwa, District Dausa whereby, the claim for traveling allowance raised by the petitioner has been rejected. It is stated that after attaining the age of superannuation, the petitioner retired from service w.e.f.
[2026:RJ-JP:11263] (2 of 2) [CW-7002/2025] 31.08.2020 and before his retirement, the petitioner submitted bills for traveling allowance amount to Rs.3714/- and 3081/-, however, the same was not paid and in quite arbitrary manner and ignorance of the rules, the claim has been rejected vide order dated 19.02.2025.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
3. Bare perusal of order dated 19.02.2025 would reveal that the bill submitted by the petitioner have been examined by the Competent Authority in accordance with available record and it was found that there was no order permitting the petitioner to undertake traveling and even no document after due verification for the Competent Authority was produced by the petitioner in support of his bills for sanction of traveling allowance. Under these circumstances and in view of the factual statement given in order dated 19.02.2025, this Court does not find any ground to interfere in this writ petition and the same is hereby, dismissed.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/37