1 2026:CGHC:9173 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 50 of 2026 S.B.I. General Insurance Company Limited Branch Office 1st Floor, Ajeet Tower Ramsagar Para Jawahar Nagar, Raipur District Raipur C.G. (Insurance Company) ... Applicant. versus 1 - Dilip Kumar Dewangan S/o Late Awadh Ram Dewangan Aged About 47 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Simga, P S Simga, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G. 2 - Kunal Jaiswal S/o Krishna Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Giraudhpuri, P S Gidhori Tundra, District Balodabazar Bhatapara C.G. (Driver Of Vehicle No. C G 22 T 1255) 3 - Krishna Kumar Jaiswal S/o Mahajan Jaiswal Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Giraudhpuri, P S Gidhori Tundra, District Balodabazar Bhatapara C.G. (Driver Of Vehicle No. C G 22 T 1255). ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Shri KPS Gandhi, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 20/02/2026 1. This Revision has been filed against the order dated 06.09.2025 passed by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhatapara, District AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.02.23 14:44:30 +0530 2 Balodabazar C.G. in MACT No.15 of 2024, whereby delay in filing the claim petition has been condoned. 2. The applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- (i) To call for the entire records pertaining to case. (ii) To set-aside the impugned order dated 06.09.2025 passed by the Learned Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar (C.G.) in M.A.C.T. No-15/2024, titled as Dilip Kumar Dewangan vs. Kunal Jaiswal and others and dismiss the said claim case filed by respondent no. 01/claimant. (iii) To dismiss the application filed by respondent no. 01/claimant u/s 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, in the interest of justice. (iv) And to give such other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, in the interest of justice. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Revision has become infructuous as award has already been passed in this matter, as such, he will file duly constituted appeal. 4. Considering the submission and prayer made by counsel for the applicant, this Revision is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to file duly constituted appeal. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash