Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10198 (AP)

CHAREDDY KRISHNA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/26405/2026 · 2026-09-16

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010484202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26405 OF 2026 Between: 1. CHAREDDY KRISHNA REDDY, S/o. Koti Reddy, Aged about 60 years, Rio. Chandavaram village Nadendla mandal, Palnadu District. 2. Gontu Srinivasa Reddy,, S/o. Nusa Reddy, Aged about 49 years, Rio. Chandavaram village Nadendla mandal, Palnadu District. ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District - 522237. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Palnadu District, Narsaraopeta.- 590173 3. The Station House Officer, Nadendla Police Station, Palnadu District - 590173 4. Gontu Jaya Baratha Reddy, S/o. Nusa Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Rio. Chandavaram village Nadendla mandal, Palnadu District - 590173 ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 and 3 in failing to produce the CCTV footage evidence along with charge sheet, which shows that the 4th respondent dashed the 1st petitioner with a view to kill him by reversing his tractor, having collected the same in S.C. No.77/2024, on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Senior Civil judge court, Narasaraopeta, is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to produced the CCTV footage and the medical record before the Hon'ble Principal Senior Civil judge court, Narasaraopeta in S.C. No. 77/2024, and unconstitutional IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents 2 and 3 to produce the CCTV footage and the medical reports pertaining to the 2nd petitioner in S.C. No.77/2024, on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Senior Civil judge court, m Narasaraopeta, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioners: KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26405 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader expressed no objection for the same. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 17.09.2026 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26405 of 2026 Date: 17.09.2026 PSA