Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10195 (UTT)

RAMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/602/2026 · 2026-08-19

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010029262026 2026:UHC:7440 S L. N o. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/602/2026 Ramesh Kumar --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand & others --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Shalini Kotiyal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Amendra Pratap Singh, learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr. Bhupendra Koranga, learned Brief Holder for the State/respondent no.1. 3. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. Learned Additional Advocate General supplied instructions to this Court, which are taken on record. On instructions, he submits that since the transfer order which is impugned in the present writ petition has been withdrawn by the State, therefore, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 19.08.2026 AK AVNEET KAUR Digitally signed by AVNEET KAUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=a82175252dc1a0f53f0e245a1c11df9aa490cfd1403838bf52f9acab4cc3a5b9, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=5BEC18DADE54688668187E4D722C2EDBFDAF35AB2F676A551481BE62 508FDDEE, cn=AVNEET KAUR Date: 2026.08.19 17:50:35 +05'30'