IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.468 of 2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Ashok Kumar ….Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal ….Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned counsel for the respondent, has placed on record communication dated 23.05.2026 and submits that the judgment under reference has been duly complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while acknowledging the aforesaid fact of compliance of the judgment under reference, submits that at this stage, he doesn’t want to pursue the present contempt petition. 3. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge May 26, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2