Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10194 (BOM)

ABDUL KHALIL ABDUL RAHIM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/498/2014 · 2026-09-21

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

498.2014CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 498 OF 2014 IN WP/7113/2013 Abdul Khalil Abdul Rahim VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mrs. U.S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. U.L. Momale, Advocate for Respondent nos.4 and 5 ... CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. DATE : 21.09.2026 ORDER :- 1. None for the petitioner. 2. Respondent nos.4 and 5 have filed affidavit-in- reply, wherein it is stated that the order under contempt is complied with by making the payment of amount of Rs.3,67,770/-, which was directly transferred to the account of the petitioner in State Bank of India, Branch Udgir in the year 2014. 3. In view of the compliance of the order, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed of with liberty that if at all the petitioner is aggrieved by the quantum of amount determined by respondent, it would be open for the petitioner to agitate the grievance by availing the appropriate remedy under law. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:43087