Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10192 (JHR)

RAHMAN SHEKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3844/2026 · 2026-05-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13429 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3844 of 2026 1. Rahman Shekh age about 45 years, S/o Akbar Sk, 2. Meksad Sk @ Neksad Sk age about 20 years, S/o Rahman Sk 3. Mosaraf Sk @ Mosaraf age about 23 years S/o Maniruddin Sk, All are R/o village-Isakpur Naya Tola, P.O. Isakpur P.S. Pakur (M), District Pakur (Jharkhand) … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY --------- For the Petitioners: :Mr. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State :Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl.P.P. For the informant : Md. Shahid Yunus, Advocate --------- 02 /Dated: 06.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 152 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352 read with section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of the common intention attempted to murder the informant. It is next submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise. It is submitted that the petitioner nos. 1 & 2 are in custody since 30.03.2026 and the petitioner no. 3 is in judicial custody since 01.04.2026 as mentioned in para 10 of the bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioners may be admitted to regular bail. Learned counsel for the informant also submits that the compromise has been entered into between the parties and a compromise petition has been filed in the court of S.D.J.M., Pakur. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 152 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case and they undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during the pendency of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 06.05.2026 Uploaded: 07.05.2026 MM/Cp.03