Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10192 (CAL)

KRISHNA MANDAL v. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/20939/2024 · 2026-04-20

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21 20.04.2026 Court No.18 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 20939 of 2024 Krishna Mandal -versus State Bank of India & Ors. Mr. Shamil ul Bari Mr. Atarul Haque Mollah Ms. Asmita Mitra … For the petitioner Mr. Subrata Kumar Sinha … For the respondent nos.1 & 2 1. The petitioner participated for recruitment as Bank Guard under the Ex-Servicemen Category in the permanent vacancy of the State Bank of India. 2. He prays for a direction to recommend the petitioner for the subject post. 3. The report filed by the Bank mentions that the petitioner could not be selected as he failed to pass the physical aptitude test phase-II as he secured 34 marks out of 40 marks whereas the minimum qualifying marks was 36 as stated in the SOP. 4. As it appears that the petitioner has failed to qualify in the physical aptitude test, accordingly, there is no question of providing recruitment to him. 5. No relief can be granted to the petitioner in the instant case. 2 6. The writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. 7. The status of recruitment handed over by the learned advocate representing the Bank in Court today is treated as Annexure “R-4” to the report filed by way of affidavit. The same is retained with the records. 8. Copy of the same has been handed over to the learned advocate for the petitioner in Court today. 9. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)