Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10192 (AP)

C HANUMANTHA REDDY v. SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS

CC/3100/2025 · 2026-09-10

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010517832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3100/2025 Between: 1. C HANUMANTHA REDDY, S/O SANJEEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, OCC-CONTRACTOR, D.NO. 3-20, M.AGRAHARAM VILLAGE, TADIMARRI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. SRI DR P SAMPATH KUMAR I A S, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 3,4,5 FLOORS, PRIME HILL CREST, VADDESWARAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. M SAI KRISHNA, COMMISSIONER, DHARMAVARAM MUNICIPALITY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT (FORMERLY ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT) 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, deliberately, violating and not implementing the orders of the Honble High Court passed in WP. No. 22685 of 2024, Dt. 13.02.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri. Dasari S.V.V.S.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case. 2. Recording the same, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 Gss