[2026:RJ-JP:26511] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9916/2026 URN: CW / 22123U / 2026 Munni Bhanuka W/o Shri Ranjeet Dhaka D/o Shri Amar Singh Bhanuka, Aged About 51 Years, Village Hardesar, Post Tidiyasar, Distt- Churu (Raj)- 331022 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Govern- ment Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Ra- jasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family- Welfare Depart- ment, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Jain Mr. Arind Kumar Arora Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 14/07/2026 1. At the request of learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition is considered for final disposal at this stage only. 2. While placing reliance upon the judgment in the case of Firoj Arif Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Peti- tion No.18268/2016) and connected matters decided by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court on 21.03.2017, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein is no more res-integra as the same has already been decided by this [2026:RJ-JP:26511] (2 of 2) [CW-9916/2026] Hon'ble Court. He further referred the order dated 12.02.2014 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 9583/2008, 9582/2008 and 9584/2008 decided by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and submits that the order as mentioned hereinabove is also approved by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Pari- tosh Ujjwal on 09.07.2025. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the writ petition may be disposed off in light of ratio laid down by this Hon'ble Court but a liberty is granted to the Depart- ment that in case there is any factual difference about applicability of aforesaid ratio then the Department will consider the same. 4. Having considered aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed off in terms of the judgments in the case of Firoj Arif (supra) and Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal (supra), but in case there is any factual dif- ference or exists any reason to deviate from the ratio, the respon- dents are at liberty to decide the same with a well-reasoned and speaking order under intimation to the petitioner. 5. With aforesaid, the present writ petition stands disposed of with pending application(s), if any. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/119