Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10191 (ALL)

RAJVIR SINGH v. CANARA BANK, HEAD OFFICER AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/16158/2026 · 2026-09-30

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16158 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. After due deliberation at length, Sri Rahul Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars and details of the case. 2. Sri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the contesting respondents, has no objection to the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. As such, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. October 1, 2026 vkg Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Krishna Mohan Asthana (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Rajvir Singh .....Petitioner(s) Canara Bank, Head Officer And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad