[2026:RJ-JP:27099] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9332/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17115U / 2026 Saddam @ Sadda S/o Shri Yakub @ Aakub, R/o Village Gamri, Thana Jurhera District Deeg, At Present Ghadi Mewat, Thana Kho, District Deeg. (The Accused Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order dated 27.05.2026 passed by learned trial Court under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 378/2025 registered at Police Station Bari, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3), 109(1) & 61(2) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 111, 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 351(2), 351(3) & 61(2) of BNS and Section 5/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; that the accused- petitioner is not named in the FIR. He further submits that charge- [2026:RJ-JP:27099] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9332/2026] sheet has been filed and co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and submits that there are several criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. So, he may not be enlarged on bail. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record; considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody 11.02.2026; that the charge-sheet has been filed; that accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR nor any Test Identification Parade has been conducted; that accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; that co-accused persons Manish Gurjar and Himanshu @ Sunny have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 16.01.2026 and 09.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application NO. 16977/2025 and 2323/2026 respectively; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Saddam [2026:RJ-JP:27099] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9332/2026] @ Sadda S/o Shri Yakub @ Aakub is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the concerned police station on 1st and 15th day of every month till the completion of trial. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 40/SHIVANI