Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10185 (CAL)

TANKESWAR KHAN AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/1200/2025 · 2026-04-20

Kausik Chanda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20.04.2026 Sl. No.3 Ct. No.237 S.A. CRR 1200 of 2025 In the matter of: Tankeswar Khan & Ors. ………petitioners Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Ms. Sagnika Banerjee Ms. Sarmistha Basak …for the petitioners Mr. Madhusudan Sur Mr. Dipankar Paramanick …for the State This is an application for quashing of the proceedings in connection with GR (NS) 52 of 2024 arising out of Bowbazar Police Station Case No.12 dated 23.01.2024 under Section 448/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, adding Section 380/413/414/411/109/120B of the Indian Penal Code, pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Court, Calcutta. In compliance with the order dated February 2, 2026, the State has filed a status report regarding investigation. The relevant part of the report is quoted below : “In light of the foregoing, it is most respectfully submitted that the present case has been closed under order of Superiors and classified accordingly as “civil in nature”. The final report has already been submitted before Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Kolkata on 9/2/26 vide Bowbazar PS Final Report No.08/2026 Dated 8/2/26 (Certified copies of the same marked as A, B, C & D have been attached 2 herewith for your kind perusal) praying all the F.I.R. named accused persons who all are since not arrested into this case namely 1) Tankeswar Khan 2) Santanu Dutta 3) Abdul Samad all are of 14/1B, Ejra Street, Kolkata-700001, 4) Nirmal Kumar Mukim (since died on 04/06/24), S/O- Late Tarachand Mukim 5) Mrs. Alka Mukim W/O- Nirmal Kumar Mukim 6) Vikash Kumar Mukim S/O-Nirmal Kumar Mukim, sl.no-4 to 6 are of 6 Coloo Tola Street, Kolkata-700073 and also of 97/99/4 Satyam Apartment, 2nd floor, Sri Aurobindo Road, Golabari, Salkia, Howrah-711106 may be discharged from the case for want of evidence against them.” Let a copy of the report be kept with the record. In view of the aforesaid, there is no reason to keep this application pending. Accordingly, CRR 1200 of 2025 is disposed of. (Kausik Chanda, J.)