Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10184 (UTT)

RAHEES v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1581/2026 · 2026-08-19

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010140722026 WPCRL/1581/2026 Rahees --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mrs. Sangeeta Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. On the last occasion, the State was directed to seek instructions in the present matter. 3. Today, on instructions, learned State Counsel submits that no such incident, as narrated in the FIR, ever took place. It is submitted that, in fact, one Liyakat Ali lodged a complaint at the Police Station stating that an LCD was being brought from the shop of the present petitioner- Rahees, which was not in working condition. Consequently, the petitioner was called to the Police Station by Constable Irfan. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that today the petitioner has received a call from the office of the Senior Superintendent of Police and has been asked to report at the said Police Station. 5. Learned State Counsel shall seek instructions in this regard. 6. List this case after lunch. (Alok Mahra, J.) 19-08-2026 SB