M/s. Meenakshi Bright Steel Bars Pvt Ltd., v. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd.,
WP/37902/2015 · 2026-09-15
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10182 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10182 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010326422015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 37902/2015 Between:
1. M/S. MEENAKSHI BRIGHT STEEL BARS PVT LTD.,, ADD: 54,IDA, THUMKUNTHA IND. CENTRE, HINDUPUR. DISTT. ANANTAPUR DISTRICT (A.P). REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER MR. PRAVEEN GOYAL SC NOS. HT.ATP-299
...PETITIONER AND
1. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, RENIGUNTA ROAD, TIRUPATI, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER OPERATIONS CIRCLE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD. ANANTAPURAMU. 3. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER OPERATIONS CIRCLE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD. ANANTAPURAMU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of respondents in demanding Additional Consumption Deposit from the petitioner by letter Lr. No. SE /0 /ATP /SAO /JAO -HT /ACD / D.No.940/15 dated 31.05.2015 issued
2
by the 2nd respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 47(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 48763 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner company including disconnection of power supply to the petitioner's service connection ATP-350 and not to insist for payment of the subsequent instalments of Additional Consumption Deposit from the petitioner pursuant to letter Lr. No. SE /0 /ATP /SAO/JAO -HT /ACD / D.No.940/15 dated 31.05.2015 issued by the 2nd respondent and Memo No.CGM (R&IA)/GM /(Rev)/SAO/AAO/HT/ D.No.333 /15 dated 01.07.2015 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL
2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL)
3. 3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.37902 OF 2015 ORDER:-
1.
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming the following direction:
“to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of respondents in demanding Additional Consumption Deposit from the petitioner by letter Lr No SE /0 /ATP /SAO /JAO HT /ACD / D No 940/15 dated 31 05 2015 issued by the 2nd respondent as highly illegal arbitrary unjust and contrary to Section 475 of the Electricity Act 2003 and consequently set aside the same”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the 2nd respondents, vide Letter No.SE/O/ATP/SAO/JAO-HT/ACD/D.No.940/15, dated 31.05.2015, demanded an Additional Consumption Deposit (ACD) from the petitioner, which is alleged to be highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the Section 47(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Aggrieved by the said demand, the present Writ Petition is filed. 4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents has placed on record the Written Instructions submitted by the 3rd respondent herein. Wherein, it is stated that, the petitioner has paid the ACD amount as demanded in eight installments and that the security deposit is presently available is adequate as required. 5. Therefore, in view of the payment of ACD amount by the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. 4
7. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 16-09-2026 BSM
5
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.37902 OF 2015
Date 16-09-2026
W
BSM