Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10181 (ALL)

PRATHAM KUMAR v. SHRI BALA KRISHNA NARAYAN

CAPL/5091/2026 · 2026-09-29

Vikas Budhwar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5091 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging willful defiance of the order dated 04.12.2025 passed in Writ-C No. 40711 of 2025, order whereof is quoted hereinunder.- "1. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client is advancing in age being about 68 years. Members of a family fraudulently got transferred a private temple in name of their trust. His client is interested in welfare of the temple. Upon application dated 1st June, 2024 of his client, the Chief Secretary directed the District Magistrate, on order dated 2nd July, 2024, to obtain possession of the ashram from Veerpal, son of Ram Saran. At present his client wants that the government take control of the Ashram. His client filed case bearing no. 17866/24/18/2024 pending before respondent no. 2 (U.P. Human Rights Commissions). 2. Mr. Raj Mohan Upadhyay, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of respondent no. 1 (State). He submits, there is civil litigation pending in respect of the ashram. 3. Paragraph-19 from the writ petition is reproduced below. "That due to deteriorating health and advancing age the petitioner wrote a letter on 18.-7.2024 to Chief Secretary Govt. of U.P. Lucknow requesting that the said ashram be given under the control of government of Uttar Pradesh." As petitioner has approached the Commission, we direct petitioner to obtain and communicate certified copy of this order to it. We request the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sheo Ram Singh Pratham Kumar .....Applicant(s) Shri Bala Krishna Narayan .....Opposite Party(s) Commission to deal with petitioner's aforesaid case and inform him the decision taken, by four weeks from date of the communication. It be kept in mind petitioner has not said he has title. Accordingly, the Commission, in dealing with petitioner's case will decide on who to notice. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. " 2. Today, Shri Nikhil Kumar has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party, according to which, the opposite party has demitted the charge of the Chairperson, Uttar Pradesh Manvadhikar Ayog, Lucknow on 05.06.2024 and the order of the Writ Court is dated 04.12.2025. He has also produced before this Court an order passed on 05.02.2026 deciding the said proceedings. 3. In view of the same, the present contempt application has outlived its utility and life, the same is consigned to record. September 30, 2026 Rajesh CAPL No. 5091 of 2026 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad