- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16707-DB WA No. 704 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 704 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ASHWATHAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS 1A K. SREEDHAR S/O. LATE C. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.28/1, 4TH DIVISION JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE - 560105 1B VASANTHI BANNA D/O. LATE C. KRISHNAPPA W/O. BANNA MADUSUDAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.23/17 18TH MAIN, 80 FEET ROAD BEHIND CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE GOKUL 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE MSRTI, BANGALORE NORTH Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16707-DB WA No. 704 of 2025 BANGALORE - 560054 1C K. SRINIVASA S/O. LATE C. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT JIGANI MAIN ROAD JIGANI VILLAGE & HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 560105 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ANANTHARAMA C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O LATE PUTTAHONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT JIGANI VILLAGE ANNAPOORNESHWARI HOTEL, NEAR MUTHYALAMMA TEMPLE STREET JIGANI MAIN ROAD ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PIN CODE 560105 2. SRI. PARAMASHIVAIAH S/O LATE PUTTAHONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT JIGANI VILLAGE ANNAPOORNESHWARI HOTEL, NEAR MUTHYALAMMA TEMPLE STREET JIGANI MAIN ROAD ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PIN CODE 560105 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16707-DB WA No. 704 of 2025 3. SRI. SOMASHEKARA S/O LATE PUTTAHONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT JIGANI VILLAGE ANNAPOORNESHWARI HOTEL, NEAR MUTHYALAMMA TEMPLE STREET JIGANI MAIN ROAD ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PIN CODE 560105 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH ANEKAL TALUK ANEKAL 562106 5. TOWN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION JIGANI, ITTINA NAGAR, JIGANI BANGALORE 560105 6. SRI. CHIKKAAPPAJI S/O LATE MALLAIAH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, RESIDING AT JIGANI VILLAGE NEAR A.K.N.HOSPITAL MAIN ROAD JIGANI HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PIN CODE 560105 7. 7A SRI. MALLESH SINCE DEAD BY LRS SMT. MANGALAMMA W/O LATE MALLESH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16707-DB WA No. 704 of 2025 7B. SRI. MALLIKARJUNA S/O LATE MALLESH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 7C. SRI. DEEPU S/O LATE MALLESH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R7(A) TO (C) ARE RESIDING AT SHIVANAGARA MAIN ROAD JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE 560105 ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE 560105 8 SRI. MUNIVENKATA REDDY S/O. VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT MANJUNATH NAGAR JIGANI MAIN ROAD, NEAR TENT CIRCLE JIGANI VILLAGE & HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PINCODE 560105 9 SRI. PRASANTH M S/O. MUNIVENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT MANJUNATH NAGAR JIGANI MAIN ROAD, NEAR TENT CIRCLE JIGANI VILLAGE & HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PINCODE 560105 - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16707-DB WA No. 704 of 2025 10 SMT. PAVANI M W/O. RAGHUNATH REDDY D/O. MUNIVENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/T MANJUNATH NAGAR JIGANI MAIN ROAD, NEAR TENT CIRCLE JIGANI VILLAGE & HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT PINCODE 560105 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No-24021/2016 VIDE ORDER DATED 13.02.2025 AND ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) This intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the order dated 13.02.2025 passed by the writ Court in W.P. No.24021/2016. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16707-DB WA No. 704 of 2025 In respect of the land in question, the appellant has filed a suit for declaration in O.S. No.286/2016. The learned single Judge has disposed of the writ petition with the observation that if the appellant succeeded in O.S. No.286/2016 filed by him, the authorities would be bound by the said decree and make entries accordingly. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned single Judge. However, we direct the revenue authorities to make an endorsement against the revenue entries in the revenue records regarding the order passed by the writ Court that the revenue entries are subject to the outcome of the suit in O.S. No.286/2016. Writ appeal is disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE AN/-