Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10175 (JHR)

JIYAUL ANSARI ALLIAS JIYUL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3512/2026 · 2026-04-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:12466) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3512 of 2026 Jiyaul Ansari @ Jiyaul Anari, aged about 30 years, son of late Alauddin Ansari, Resident of village – Chhalapathar, PO & PS – Jama, District – Dumka. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jagat Kr. Soni, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 04, Dated:- 28th April, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Masalia P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 308(2), 351, 3(5) of B.N.S. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in the commission of offence of extortion and looted the informant by impersonating as Police Personnel. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that keeping in view the impersonation of the petitioner as Police Officer and there is direct allegation of serious nature against the petitioner, there is every chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner ought not be admitted to bail. Considering the serious nature of allegation against the petitioner and the chance of the petitioner absconding and tampering with the evidence, if released on bail, this Court is not inclined to admit the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Aditi