1 2026:CGHC:20683 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4114 of 2026 Rakhi Turang Wife Of Arun Turang Aged About 40 Years Resident Of Village Sonpairi, P.S. Mujgahan, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Ranitarai, District – Durg (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 04.05.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 123/2025, registered at Police Station – Ranitarai, District – Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 178, 179, 180, 181 and 3(5) of the BNS. 2. The case of the prosecution, is that the informant has given information to the concerned police station alleging inter-alia is that on the date of incident the accused persons were kept some counterfeit note in their possession for selling and the police has seized 10/ of 6 nag, 50/ of 18 nag, 100/- of 38 nag and 200/- of 10 nag of counterfeit note from the possession of the applicant. Based upon the such complaint crime has been registered against the applicant. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and there is no criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. It is further submitted that the applicant happens to be a lady and the husband of the applicant also involved in the present case. The applicant is in jail since 30.12.2025 and trial is likely to take quite long time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case, and the applicant is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that there is no criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, and the applicant happens to be a lady and the husband of the applicant is also involved in the present case, and the case of the applicant is distinguishable from that of the co-accused, the applicant is in jail since 30.12.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application. 7. Let applicant, Rakhi Turang, involved in Crime No. 123/2025, registered at Police Station – Ranitarai, District – Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 178, 179, 180, 181 and 3(5) of the 3 BNS, be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar