1 2026:CGHC:19705 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9550 of 2023 Smt. Victoria Lakra, Aged About 61 Years 11 Months, W/o Shri M. Lakra, Occupation Service Working As Head Master, Middle School, Jambahar, Block Lailunga, Post Office Lailunga, District Raigarh Chhattisarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Department Of School Education, New Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Secretary, General Administration Department New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Director, Directorate (Public Instructions), Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Commissioner, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Collector, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Joint Director, Department Of School Education, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 8 - The Assistant Commissioner, Department Of Tribal Welfare, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 9 - The District Education Officer, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 10 - The District Education Officer, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 11 - The Block Education Officer, Block Lailunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents {Cause title, as taken from CIS} For Petitioner : Mr. A.N. Bhakta & Mr. Vivek Bhakta, Advocates. For Respondents : Mr. Akanksha Verma Dabhedkar & Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Panel Lawyers 2 In compliance of the order dated 15.04.2026, Dr. K.V. Rao, Officer In-charge of the cases/ District Education officer, Raigarh is also present in person. {Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi} Order on Board 28/04/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition in light of the changed circumstances. 2. Counsel for the respondents have no objection to allow the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 3. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as sought for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.05.02 12:16:12 +0530