IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16469 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2021 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Yogendra Yadav @ Jogan Yadav @ Nogan Yadav, Son of Late Bihari Yadav, R/o Village - Phulparas, P.S - Phulparas, District -Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Udeshya Kr. Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 13-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 157 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 25(1-a), 26(i), 25(1-A), 26(ii) and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the informant has input that illegal weapons are manufactured in the house of the petitioner with the help of his three sons. The house of the petitioner was raided. It is further alleged that petitioner fled away and other co-accused persons were caught and from Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16469 of 2026(2) dt.13-03-2026 2/3 the house of this petitioner, one 12 bore single barrel gun, two 12 bore double barrel gun, one country made pistol, one sword and several materials used in making weapons were recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. He was not apprehended at the time of seizure. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. It has further been submitted that the other co-accused who were apprehended at the spot, have been granted bail by learned Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 60579 of 2021. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.11.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of four cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16469 of 2026(2) dt.13-03-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Jhanjharpur in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 157 of 2021. lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T