[2026:RJ-JP:26266] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9290/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17049U / 2026 Sharafat S/o Muddin, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Padavda, Ps Nouganwa, District Alwar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Jail At Alwar) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through Special PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 09.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 188/2026 registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 112(2), 240, 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS and Sections 66-C and 66-D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet is proposed to be filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that co-accused has been enlarged on bail and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by [2026:RJ-JP:26266] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9290/2026] keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there is one another criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet is proposed to be filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2026; that co-accused has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 04.06.2026 by the Trial Court itself and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sharafat S/o Muddin is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application [2026:RJ-JP:26266] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9290/2026] against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 53/HEENA