Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10171 (BOM)

CHANDRAKANT RUSTUMRAO MORE v. DATTATRAY KESHAVRAO MORE AND ORS

CP/442/2012 · 2026-09-21

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

442.2012CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 442 OF 2012 IN WP/2734/2011 Chandrakant Rustumrao More VERSUS Dattatray Keshavrao More And Ors ... Mr. Godbole R.J., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr.N.B. Patil,AGP for Respondent/State Mr.D.A. Karnik h/f Mr. Vivek Dhage, Advocate for Respondent nos.1 and 2. ... CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 21.09.2026 P.C. : 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired on 30.12.2013. 2. Learned advocate holding for Mr.Dhage, leanred advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 has placed on record the Statement of Account, wherein payment of subsistence allowance is reflected as paid to the petitioner on 04.04.2013, 30.05.2013, 04.07.2013 and 13.09.2013. The said Statement of Account is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3. The Headmistress, Mrs. Anita Kulkarni of Nehru Vidyalaya, Golapangri is present in the Court. 4. In view of the statement made by respondent nos.1 and 2 as to the compliance of the order by paying 2026:BHC-AUG:43082 442.2012CP 2 subsistence allowance to the petitioner, nothing survives in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE sga