AMAN @ AMAN ALI @ AMAN BACCHA S/O AHSAN ALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7050/2026 · 2026-07-15
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10170 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10170 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26780] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7050/2026 URN: CRLMB / 12744U / 2026 Aman @ Aman Ali @ Aman Baccha S/o Ahsan Ali, Aged 25 Years, R/o Behind Gulshan Madarsa, Sajidehda, Bakramandi, Kishorpura, P.S. Kishorepura, District Kota City (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Gadwal Mr. Waseem Akram For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 15/07/2026
1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order of learned trial Court dated 18.04.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 54/2026 registered at Police Station R K Puram, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 310(4) & 310(5) of BNS and Sections 3, 4 & 25 of Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statements of co-accused. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been filed. He submits that the co-accused persons from whose possession firearms were
[2026:RJ-JP:26780] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7050/2026] recovered, have already been enlarged on bail; that no firearm has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and submits that there are several criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that accused- petitioner is in custody since 12.02.2026; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; that co- accused persons Mohd. Ayan, Saddam Hussain, Imran @ Parchi, Salman @ Ganja and Soyab Khan have been enlarged on bail by the trial Court itself vide orders dated 23.02.2026 and 17.02.2026 and co-accused persons Pawan and Akhtar Hussain have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 13.03.2026 and 08.04.2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Aman @ Aman Ali @ Aman Baccha S/o Ahsan Ali is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum
[2026:RJ-JP:26780] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7050/2026] of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6.
It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall his mark presence 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station till the completion of the trial. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 21/EKTA