1 2026:CGHC:20346 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3786 of 2026 1 - Khemraj Sahu S/o Abhay Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Occupatioin Posted Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Government Primary School Karhul Sankul Vishrampur - Block -Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara C.G. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School, Education Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Civil And Revenue District Raipur C.G. 490002. 2 - Directorate, Public Instruction Department Of School Education, Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3 - Collector And District Election Officer, District- Balodabazar Bhatapara C.G. 4 - Joint Director Education, Division Raipur District Raipur C.G. 5 - District Teachury Officer Balodabazar -Bhatapara C.G. 6 - Block Education Officer, Simga -Balodabazar Bhatapara District Balodabazar Bhatapra C.G. 7 - District Education Officer, Balodabazar Bhatapara District Balodabazar Bhatapara C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Sahu, Advocate For Respondents-State : Ms. Sakshi Bajpai, Panel Lawyer 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 01/05 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, This hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct to the respondent Authority to consider and decide the petitioners application dated 11.02.2026 and its reminder dated 02.04.2026 (Annexure P/1) which is pending within stipulated time and reappoint the petitioner as assistant teacher as per law; 10.2 This hon'ble Court may kindly be please to kind enough to direction to the respondent Authority to reappointment of the petitioner in post of Assistant teacher L.B. because he will be retire on the year 2040 his service remain more than 16 years. 10.3 That any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already submitted representations before the Respondent No. 1 for redressal of his grievance as raised in this writ petition on 11.02.2026 which is pending consideration and therefore, he is not pressing this writ petition on merits at this stage and is only seeking direction to the Respondent No. 1 to consider and take decision on the representation at the earliest expeditiously, within specified time frame. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State would submit that as petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction to the Respondent No. 1, she is having no objection to the limited prayer. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised 3 by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the claim of petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondent No. 1 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 11.02.2026 (Annexure P/1) submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of order. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY