1 APHC010135592026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7340/2026 Between: 1. EATE RAMACHANDRAIAH, S/O. EATE SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. GRADE-ILL CONTRACTOR, RESIDENT OF D.NO.2/195, MARUTI NAGAR, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522237 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522237 3. THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS.. COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 516002 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 516002 5. THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, 516001. 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT RR 6 AND 7 ARE SUO MOTU 2 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.07.04.2026 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Sk. Sultana, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Papudippu Sashidhar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kadapa Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kadapa Municipal Corporation, submits that the amounts have been paid. 3. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, confirms this position that the amounts have been received by the Writ Petitioner and therefore, no further consideration is necessary. 4. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:21.04.2026 Vns