Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5782 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 347 of 2026
Subhash Yadav, aged about 35 years, S/o Umesh Yadav, Resident of Village-Dharmodih, P.O. +P.S.- Mahagama, District-Godda.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Ms.Vani Kumari, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Advocate
---
03/26.02.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2023 in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No. 107 of 2022 corresponding to S.T. No. 144 of 2023, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Godda.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the victim and his bail application was rejected by co- ordinate bench of this Court in B.A. No. 874 of 2025. She submits that the charge was framed as back as on 14.07.2023, but no witnesses has been examined and the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2023.
4. The alleged offence is of 04.07.2022.
5. Considering the serious allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. The instant bail application is rejected.
7. However, the State is directed to ensure prompt production of witnesses.
8.
Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this
order to the Director, Prosecution as well as Superintendent of Police of the concerned district.
2026:JHHC:5782 2
9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 26.02.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-26.02.2026