[2026:RJ-JP:26256] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8608/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15731U / 2026 Sehzad Ahmad S/o Mohommad Umar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Kharadi Moholla, City Sawai Madhopur. (At Present In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8920/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16370U / 2026 Dinesh S/o Rambilas, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ghas Mandi, Chhabri Chowk, Aalanpur, Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Bhardwaj Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/07/2026 1. The instant bail applications have been filed against the orders of the learned trial Court dated 27.05.2026 and 29.05.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0096/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur, for the [2026:RJ-JP:26256] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8608/2026] offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 340(2), 342(1) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners Sehzad Ahmad & Dinesh are in custody since 22.05.2026 and 23.05.2026 respectively; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Sehzad Ahmad S/o Mohommad Umar & Dinesh S/o Rambilas are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of [2026:RJ-JP:26256] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8608/2026] them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bails. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the applications against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 42-43/HEENA