Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10163 (KAR)

SMT. S SHOBHA v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER

WP/28704/2023 · 2026-04-09

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19876 WP No. 28704 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 28704 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. S SHOBHA W/O SRI LATE KARTHIK C, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO 3398, 8TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, KUMARARASWAMY LAYOUT II STAGE, BENGALURU 560 078. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT 95-1, 16TH MAIN ROAD, J C NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU 560 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MURALIDHAR S R.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, LIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD, NO 15/1, HAYES CENTRE, HAYES ROAD, BENGALURU 560 025. 2. MANJULA C W/O SRI CHANDRA BABU C, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO 48, 2ND CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, NEAR RELIANCE FRESH, 1ST PHASE, MANJUNATH NAGAR, BENGALURU NORTH, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU 560 010. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19876 WP No. 28704 of 2023 3. THE DIRECTOR SERVICES AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, DARSHANA HALL, TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD, 2ND FLOOR, J P DEVI JAMBUKESHWAR ARCADE, NO 69, MILLERS ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA 560 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIGNESH SHETTY.,ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 R/W ARTICLE 300-A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R1 NOTICE AGAINST THE DEAD PERSON VIDE DTD 30.10.23 PLACED AT ANNEXURE-H IN VIEW OF THE PENDENCY OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINT IN CC NO. 243/23 BEFORE THE 4TH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES COMMISSION AT BENGALURU AS PER ANNEXURE-G AND DIRECT THE R1 TO CONSIDER THE REPLY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER, HEREIN AGAINST THE DEMAND NOTICE , VIDE DTD 07.11.23 AND 27.11.23 AS PER ANNEXURE-J AND K AND DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO WITHDRAW THE MEASURES INITIATED UNDER SECTION 13 OF THE SARFASEI ACT, 2002 IN VIEW OF THE PENDENCY OF THE CONSUMER COMPLAINT IN CC NO. 243/23 BEFORE THE 4TH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT BENGALURU AS PER ANNEXURE-G THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19876 WP No. 28704 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.1/Bank has withdrawn the measures taken by them. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65