[2026:RJ-JP:25949] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6276/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11278U / 2026 1. Hansraj S/o Lalaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Modsa, Police Station Dei, District Bundi (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Bundi) 2. Shaitan S/o Rajaram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Modsa, Police Station Dei, District Bundi (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Bundi) 3. Sonu S/o Ramniwas, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Modsa, Police Station Dei, District Bundi (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Bundi) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 10/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners against the orders of learned trial Court dated 01.04.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.37/2026 registered at Police Station Dei, District Bundi for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 189(2) of BNS in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(2), 118(1), 191(2), 191(3) and 190 of BNS. 2. On instructions, learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that he does not want to press the present bail application in respect of accused-petitioner Hansraj S/o Lalaram. [2026:RJ-JP:25949] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6276/2026] 3. In view of the above, the present S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6276/2026 is dismissed as not pressed qua accused-petitioner Hansraj S/o Lalaram. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that injury sustained by the injured Ramphool on his head is attributed to co-accused Hansraj; that co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and submits that there is one another criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner Sonu. 6. Heard and perused the material available on record and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 25.03.2026; that grievous injury sustained by the injured on his vital part is attributed to co-accused Hansraj; that co-accused persons namely Pradhan and Kaluram have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 17.04.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5801/2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the [2026:RJ-JP:25949] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6276/2026] merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Shaitan S/o Rajaram and Sonu S/o Ramniwas are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence once in a month in the concerned police station. 9. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 10. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 12/EKTA