Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10155 (CHH)

SMT. RAJESHWARI SAHU v. MANISH KUMAR SAHU

CRR/501/2026 · 2026-05-03

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20706 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 501 of 2026 Smt. Rajeshwari Sahu W/o Manish Kumar Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Mohlai, Durg, Tahsil And District - Durg Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus Manish Kumar Sahu S/o Motilal Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Baghera, Ward No. 56, Tahsil And District – Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Ankush Soni, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 04.05.2026 1. Heard Mr. Ankush Soni, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer: “ It is, Therefore, Prayed That This Hon'ble Court may kindly be Pleased to allow this instant petition and set- aside the impugned order dated 03.12.2025 passed by the Learned Principal Judge Family court Durg District Durg (C.G.) in miscellaneous criminal case number. 713/2024 and grant the maintenance Amount of Rs. 40,000 /- per month in the interest of Justice. ” 3. The present criminal revision is beyond time as has been reported by the Registry. 4. From perusal of application for condonation of delay, it is apparent that the applicant has not given day to day explanation of inordinate delay of 36 days in filing the revision, as such, the revision is barred by delay and laches and is not liable to be entertained. 5. Considering the grounds raised in I.A. No. 01/2026, I do not find any RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 good ground to condone the delay of 36 days in preferring the revision. 6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2026 is rejected and consequently thereto, the revision is also dismissed. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar