21.2012CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 21 OF 2012 IN WP/295/2011 Yogesh Laxman Mahajan VERSUS Shantaram Tukaram Patil And Ors ... Mr.Kalyan Patil h/f Mr.Barlinge S.R., Advocate for Petitioner Mr.Rajdeep D. Raut, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.1. ... CORAM : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J. DATE : 21.09.2026 P.C. : 1. The contempt petition was filed in the year 2012 in respect of disobedience of the order passed in Writ Petition No.295/2011 of the order dated 31.01.2011. 2. The order of which the contempt is alleged was subsequently challenged by way of Letters Patent Appeal No.52/2015 and the same was disposed of on 6th July, 2015, wherein the present petitioner, who was respondent no.1, was satisfied with the amount, which was deposited by the Management in the Court and further the said amount must have been withdrawn by the petitioner. 3. Learned Advocate for respondent no.1 has placed on record the order in Letters Patent Appeal No.52/2015. 2026:BHC-AUG:43079 21.2012CP 2 4. In view of the same, the order under contempt is complied with. As such, the contempt petition stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] JUDGE sga