IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Maneet Choujar and others UT Administration and CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner Mr. Sum for the DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to make the prayer made through this petition in the pending civil suit already preferred by the petitioners CS-358-2026 “ Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that while granting the afore liberty, we neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability/entertainabilit the remedy that the petitioner April 01, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.153 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9599 Date of Decision : Maneet Choujar and others Versus UT Administration and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel or the respondents. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to make the prayer made through this petition in the pending civil suit already preferred by the petitioners 2026 “Maneet Choujar Vs. Chandigarh Administration Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that while granting the afore liberty, we neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability/entertainabilit the remedy that the petitioners may avail. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9599-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 01.04.2026 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI t Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioners to make the prayer made through this petition in the pending civil suit already preferred by the petitioners being Maneet Choujar Vs. Chandigarh Administration.” Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that while granting the afore liberty, we have neither commented on the merits nor the maintainability/entertainability of DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.04.02 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document