1 2026:CGHC:20404-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 63 of 2025 1 - Pothapragada Srinivas S/o Pothapragada Kamala Kumar Aged About 57 Years R/o 10-3-14/ A /1/1, Humayun Nagar, Lane Opposite Police Station, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Gagandip Singh Arora S/o Shri Gurmeet Singh Arora Aged About 33 Years R/o Near Primary School, Torwa, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Contact Address Shop No. 8, Gagan Chamber, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate. For State/Respondent No. 1: Mr. S. S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. K. P. S. Gandhi, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 01/05/2026 1. Heard Mr. Aman Tamboli, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.05.05 10:46:06 +0530 2 heard Mr. S. S. Baghel, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State/Respondent No.1, Mr. K. P. S. Gandhi, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased call for the records for its kind perusal. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate Writ(s)/Order(s)/Direction(s) quashing the impugnedFirst Information Report bearing Crime No.1031 of 2024 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur on 27/10/2024 against the petitioner for alleged offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 upon the complaint made by the Respondent No.2/complainant for the incident alleged to have occurred on 12/10/2022 (ANNEXURE P-1), in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 submits that, after completion of the investigation, the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 07.07.2025, and a copy of the same has been placed on board, which is taken on record. 3 4. In view of the above, the present petition is accordingly dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law if he aggrieved by the charge-sheet. 5. The interim order, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok