IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9162 of 2026 CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 10.04.2026. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged refusal of the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar to accept the mutation application proposed to be submitted by him for mutation of land. No reasons have been indicated. In fact, the application itself appears to have not been accepted. 4. This Court has time and again held that the Tahasildar being a functionary under the statute cannot refuse to accept the mutation application submitted for mutation of land. Though, the decision whether to mutate it or not can be taken by him. 5. In such view of the matter, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar to accept the mutation Smruti Haldar .… Petitioner Represented by Mr. S.K.Nayak, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others .… Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. J. Sahoo, Additional Standing Counsel Order No. 02. . application proposed to be submitted by the petitioner and consider the same in accordance with law. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge AKB