Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10146 (CHH)

JAGESHWARI BAI DHEEWAR v. SHAMSHER ALI

MAC/610/2019 · 2026-05-03

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20730 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 610 of 2019 1 - Jageshwari Bai Dheewar W/o Rath Ram Dheewar Aged About 20 Years R/o Village - Semartaal, Police Station - Koni, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Kumari Sakshi Dheewar D/o Rath Ram Dheewar Aged About 5 Years Minor Through Her Mother Jageshwari Bai Dheewar, R/o Village - Semartaal, Police Station - Koni, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant Versus 1 - Shamsher Ali S/o Sh. Saffik Ali, Aged About 33 Years R/o Jarhabhata, Kumharpara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Presently Residing At Yadunandan Nagar, House No. 117, Near Water Tank, Tifra Police Station Sirgitti, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Driver And Owner Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration No. C.G. - 10 - A - 9300), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited, Through Manager, Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur (Rajsthan ) (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration No. C.G. - 10 - A - 9300), District : Jaipur, Rajasthan ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellants : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Mansi Bandey, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 04.05.2026 1. At the very outset, since cross-objection filed by the appellants/claimants has already been decided in another appeal filed SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 by the respondents herein, learned counsel for the appellants does not wish to press this appeal. 2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if